The Demise of Old News

A Cheap Massage

 picture-41

Whilst feebly attempting to ingratiate myself to journalists on various regional papers in the North of England, I have had to field the question on numerous occasions of why I want to be a journalist at a time when the entire industry is going to hell. It is tempting to sit here and characterise this view as the doom-prophesying of a few small-time, washed-out, pint-gripping, sermonising, brow-beating no-hopers clinging on for their retirement before the sea of change can sweep them away.

It seems, however, that these concerns are shared by widely respected and internationally renowned journalists. Guardian News and Media Executive Emily Bell used the phrases “systematic collapse” and “unprecedented carnage” in a recent speech to the think-tank Polis.  In a similar vein, the current assistant-editor of the Guardian, Dr David Leigh articulated an impending dystopia for good old fashioned reporting in his Inaugural lecture. He talks nostalgically of cutting his teeth on The Scotsman in the 1960s before concluding:

“This primitive process of heavy engineering was romantic and dirty. None of us realised at the time just how absolutely doomed it was, from top to bottom. What remains is now produced in a glass rabbit-hutch with a bank of computer screens, by two men and a dog. It is dying quietly.”

The uncouth Marxist that exists within me wants to suggest those at the top are more concerned about the loss of a media unconfined to a liberal elite rather than a general decay of journalistic standards. Maybe this across-board horror at the prospect of a digital revolution is indicative of a liberal elite out of touch with and therefore resisting the tools of the next generation. But, if Leigh and Bell are right and the page is turning on the world of the newspaper, it is worth acknowledging that the current debate about Web 2.0’s significance for modern journalism is framed by a very simple physical hinderance.  The internet and particularly the gleaming screen of internet news is still a very new thing. I was born before it was, and my generation are really the first to be versed in its uses and workings.

My Mum had to learn how to use a computer and it was quite literally a blood, sweat and tears job. Hilarious to watch. My Dad still employs the classic pose of index finger poised over keyboard, tongue sticking out at a peculiar angle, forehead like a Klingon. Watching him write an email is a bit like watching a guy with a broken arm eat a boiled egg.

As I am inherently far more media savvy than my parents, so my kids will be receptive to new media in ways that will render my technological ability as roughly equivalent to the chimps at the start of 2001. Around the same time I’m sure will be probably be heralding the death of journalism due to the erosion of values and standards by the usurping generation.

Therefore, it’s probably worth listening to people like David Leigh, and to reject the notion of an indiscriminate, sourceless media, obsessed with the next new ‘platform’ and 24/7, up-the-minute breaking news whilst failing to give due notice and attention to a credible voice saying significant things.

The mass media can shine a light,” he says. “Or they can reflect back light. The Daily Mail, for example, deliberately make a highly-profitable business out of telling people what they think they know already. They reflect back their existing beliefs. They reassure their target audience by hammering the world into a shape that suits their prejudices.  This is less an information service than a form of cheap massage.”

For all the convenience of Web 2.0, for all its rich potential for journalism, communication and as a tool for information in a democratic hyper-reality, it seems to be giving rise to a something-for-nothing-culture. Then what will be left with? The inexorable tabloidisation of our media, a blogosphere based on inference, agenda and an axe to grind over carefully considered analysis, indisputable information and a statutory obligation to objectivity. An unmediated media acting as a cheap massage – convenient and soothing, but fleeting and ultimately (sometimes hopefully) inconsequential.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Demise of Old News

  1. Internet journalism will only take off if it makes money. Print journalism, with its attendant advertising, is now a global multi million pound business, cf Murdoch. Of course this then skews what becomes “news”, as editors are forced to spike anything controversial that may upset the business interests. Hence the celebrity obsession in our newspapers, even the quality ones, as this is safe territory.
    The internet may have a niche for journalists to tell it how it really is, though 3 questions remain:
    1. Will they get sued?
    2.Who will read their pearls of wisdom, in amongst all the other dross on the net?
    3.How will they earn money from this?

    PS If I have a broken arm, I eat my boiled egg using the other arm.

  2. The way in which we access news is undoubtedly rapidly changing and diversifying. Just by the very nature of the new mediums available- the democratisation you talk of- it is clear that the desire for insightful and informed comment on news events remains. Newspapers themselve have seemed to embrace this, with more column inches and ever growing budgets dedicated to essentially opinion based copy. For example, the Guardian’s G2 section or the similar T2 in the Times. Whether the sheer scale of opinion on the internet will spell the end for newspapers remains to be seen. However, I feel that the constant pressure and competition driven by the internet is (for the present) increasing the standard and depth of analysis of a subject. Clearly the next logical step is for popular and insightful bloggers to be able to cross over to newspapers as well. This process has already started (albeit slowly) again for example the G2 where there is now a weekly analysis of blogs and the prevailing opinion. As to what the future holds, this will be like trying to predict the impact of any new technology or medium- usually misguided. I feel that Dad has raised some intersting points about whether the lack of commercial intersts for internet bloggers will present news in a more transparent manner. PS good blog tom. PPS how would you get the top off the egg with only one hand?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: